WebThe Supreme Court's March 27 decision in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 133 S.Ct. 24 (2013) decertified a class action in an antitrust case. The majority concluded that the damages model tendered by plaintiffs' expert witness was flawed, holding that evidence of … Webv. Caroline Behrend, et al. Docketed: January 12, 2012: Linked with 11A534: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: Case Nos.: (10-2865) Decision Date: ... Reply of petitioners Comcast Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed) May 14 2012: DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 17, 2012. May 21 2012: DISTRIBUTED for …
Comcast v. Behrend Cato Institute
WebApr 19, 2013 · By Matthew G. Ball and Jason N. Haycock The Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend all but invites defendants to make a number of arguments when attempting to defeat class ... WebComcast v. Behrend. This case involves an antitrust action alleging that Comcast’s acquisitions and “swap agreements” with competing cable providers were anti … san diego county parole office
Predominance Environmental and Toxic Tort Defense Insight
WebMar 31, 2015 · Kenneth L. Racowski (Of Counsel-Philadelphia) authored “No Consensus on Application of ‘Comcast v. Behrend’” that appeared in the March 31, 2015, issue of The … Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 569 U.S. 27 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with class certification under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The case restricted class certifications. The votes were split upon typical ideological lines, but, in an unusual move, the dissent was jointly written by two justices. WebApr 10, 2013 · Read our ClassActionOhio Blog. For an opinion that “breaks no new ground on the standard for certifying a class,” and “turns on the straightforward application of class-certification principles,” the U.S. Supreme Court’s most recent decision on class action certification, Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 2013 LEXIS 2544 (March 27, 2013), sure … san diego county ohio